
doi: 10.4000/12e2y
This essay engages in a discussion on concepts of power, contrasting the works of the South Korean philosopher Byung-Chul Han with discussions on the subject within the scope of anthropology. Within the limits of this essay, the text provides a minimal review of anthropological traditions of studies on power, followed by a presentation of themes that are exposed in Han’s work, especially related to how the author conceptualizes power. While the philosopher proposes the pursuit of a mobile concept, whose appearance could be modified depending on the movement of its constituent aspects; in anthropology, studies on power are centrally linked to the development of ethnography and the study of precise empirical contexts, with no unequivocal concept of power ever being constituted. Despite seemingly irreconcilable differences, this essay suggests that Han’s work can be incorporated into anthropological readings by the possibility of revising the places attributed to power in our research and by its potential contribution to studies dedicated to issues associated with contemporary anthropologies and critical events situated in these times.
Poder, etnografia, Contemporary Anthropology, poder, Byung-Chul Han, Ethnography, antropologia do poder, contemporary anthropology, ethnography, Antropologia do Poder, power, Antropologia do contemporâneo, anthropology of the contemporary, antropologia do contemporaneo, Anthropology of Power, Etnografia, Power, anthropology of power, Byung-Chul-Han
Poder, etnografia, Contemporary Anthropology, poder, Byung-Chul Han, Ethnography, antropologia do poder, contemporary anthropology, ethnography, Antropologia do Poder, power, Antropologia do contemporâneo, anthropology of the contemporary, antropologia do contemporaneo, Anthropology of Power, Etnografia, Power, anthropology of power, Byung-Chul-Han
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
