
arXiv: 1909.11219
I prove an envelope theorem with a converse: the envelope formula isequivalentto a first‐order condition. Like Milgrom and Segal's (2002) envelope theorem, my result requires no structure on the choice set. I use the converse envelope theorem to extend to general outcomes and preferences the canonical result in mechanism design that any increasing allocation is implementable, and apply this to selling information.
FOS: Economics and business, envelope theorem, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), Mechanism design theory, first-order condition, mechanism design
FOS: Economics and business, envelope theorem, Economics - Theoretical Economics, Theoretical Economics (econ.TH), Mechanism design theory, first-order condition, mechanism design
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
