
arXiv: 1702.02896
In many areas, practitioners seek to use observational data to learn a treatment assignment policy that satisfies application‐specific constraints, such as budget, fairness, simplicity, or other functional form constraints. For example, policies may be restricted to take the form of decision trees based on a limited set of easily observable individual characteristics. We propose a new approach to this problem motivated by the theory of semiparametrically efficient estimation. Our method can be used to optimize either binary treatments or infinitesimal nudges to continuous treatments, and can leverage observational data where causal effects are identified using a variety of strategies, including selection on observables and instrumental variables. Given a doubly robust estimator of the causal effect of assigning everyone to treatment, we develop an algorithm for choosing whom to treat, and establish strong guarantees for the asymptotic utilitarian regret of the resulting policy.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, double robustness, Econometrics (econ.EM), Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Decision theory, semiparametric efficiency, Machine Learning (cs.LG), FOS: Economics and business, Statistics - Machine Learning, FOS: Mathematics, minimax regret, empirical welfare maximization, Economics - Econometrics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, double robustness, Econometrics (econ.EM), Mathematics - Statistics Theory, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Decision theory, semiparametric efficiency, Machine Learning (cs.LG), FOS: Economics and business, Statistics - Machine Learning, FOS: Mathematics, minimax regret, empirical welfare maximization, Economics - Econometrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 142 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
