
arXiv: 2005.03698
<abstract><p>We study how to perform tests on samples of pairs of observations and predictions in order to assess whether or not the predictions are prudent. Prudence requires that the mean of the difference of the observation-prediction pairs can be shown to be significantly negative. For safe conclusions,we suggest testing both unweighted (or equally weighted) and weighted means and explicitly taking into account the randomness of individual pairs. The test methods presented are mainly specified as bootstrap and normal approximation algorithms. The tests are general but can be applied in particular in the area of credit risk,both for regulatory and accounting purposes.</p></abstract>
FOS: Computer and information sciences, credit risk, Statistics, exposure at default (ead), Statistics - Applications, HA1-4737, FOS: Economics and business, paired difference test, probability of default (pd), loss given default (lgd), credit conversion factor (ccf), Risk Management (q-fin.RM), HG1-9999, weighted mean, Applications (stat.AP), 91G40, 91G70, Finance, Quantitative Finance - Risk Management
FOS: Computer and information sciences, credit risk, Statistics, exposure at default (ead), Statistics - Applications, HA1-4737, FOS: Economics and business, paired difference test, probability of default (pd), loss given default (lgd), credit conversion factor (ccf), Risk Management (q-fin.RM), HG1-9999, weighted mean, Applications (stat.AP), 91G40, 91G70, Finance, Quantitative Finance - Risk Management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
