
In this paper, we explore three efficient time discretization techniques for the local discontinuous Galerkin (LDG) methods to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) with higher order spatial derivatives. The main difficulty is the stiffness of the LDG spatial discretization operator, which would require a unreasonably small time step for an explicit local time stepping method. We focus our discussion on the semi-implicit spectral deferred correction (SDC) method, and study its stability and accuracy when coupled with the LDG spatial discretization. We also discuss two other time discretization techniques, namely the additive Runge-Kutta (ARK) method and the exponential time differencing (ETD) method, coupled with the LDG spatial discretization. A comparison is made among these three time discretization techniques, to conclude that all three methods are efficient when coupled with the LDG spatial discretization for solving PDEs containing higher order spatial derivatives. In particular, the SDC method has the advantage of easy implementation for arbitrary order of accuracy, and the ARK method has the smallest CPU cost in our implementation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
