FOLLOW-UP AND FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN THE EHEA

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 21 Feb 2011 Spain Publisher:Omnia Publisher SLJournal:Journal of Technology and Science Education, volume 1 (eissn: 2013-6374,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Valero García, Miguel; Santamaria Barnadas, Eduard; Salamí San Juan, Esther; Canto Rodrigo, Pablo del; Gallego Fernández, María Isabel; López Canalda, José Manuel; Medina, Esunly; +4 Authors

doi: 10.3926/jotse.2011.14

handle: 2099/10293 , 2117/11647

FOLLOW-UP AND FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN THE EHEA

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

In the present paper, we describe the work being carried out by a group of professors so as to implement the follow-up and feedback processes of the activities students do throughout the first academic years in their Engineering studies. Not to mention, this project is within the EHEA (European Higher Education Area) framework. Our results show that these processes are key to enhance students learning, they can also have an impact in their academic performance and can be optimized in such a way that professors can assume the time it requires.

Peer Reviewed

Country

Spain

Related Organizations

Keywords

Technology, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge::Metodologies docents, 330, Higher education and state--Europe, 650, Student-centered learning, Ensenyament -- Innovacions, Enginyeria -- Ensenyament universitari, Education, Feedback, European higher education area, feedback, continuous assessment, student centered learning, Espai Europeu d'Educació Superior, LC8-6691, Continuous assessment, T, Student centered learning, European higher education area, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Autoaprenentatge, L, Special aspects of education, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge::Ensenyament universitari::Espai Europeu d'Educació Superior, TA1-2040

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	5
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average