<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.3852/09-314
pmid: 20943555
The three genera traditionally classified as Pilobolaceae have been identified on the basis of morphological characteristics. In the absence of distinctive morphological differences phylogenetic techniques have proven to be superior for developing phylogenies. Molecular techniques have been used primarily for studies of higher fungi; there are few investigations of the Zygomycota using genetic sequences for classification. DNA sequences coding for three regions of rRNA were used to investigate phylogenetic relationships of the three genera traditionally considered within the Pilobolaceae. Evidence indicates that Pilaira should be removed from Pilobolaceae and the family redescribed. Sporangiospore size is the morphological characteristic that most closely correlates with rDNA clades of phylogenetic trees. This study demonstrates that traditional morphological characteristics alone are not adequate to differentiate species of Pilobolus.
Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Fungi, Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S, RNA, Ribosomal, 23S, RNA, Ribosomal, 18S, DNA, Fungal, Sequence Alignment, Phylogeny
Base Sequence, Molecular Sequence Data, Fungi, Polymerase Chain Reaction, RNA, Ribosomal, 5.8S, RNA, Ribosomal, 23S, RNA, Ribosomal, 18S, DNA, Fungal, Sequence Alignment, Phylogeny
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |