
The human right to social inclusion is not well secured by the state alone. Rather, communities must be welcoming and flexible, adjusting to the contributions and needs of persons with disabilities. Attending to the practice of placing boarders with mental illness in family homes in Geel, Belgium—which integrates persons with disabilities not only into the family, but also into the town—highlights the limits of a legalistic approach to human rights, as well as the benefits of a cultural studies approach to rights. By examining the cultural practice of Geel, this article shows that the work of care can create inclusive communities. Though care has its own weaknesses—it can create power asymmetries and facilitate paternalism—this risk is moderated by the practice of reciprocal care, where care is given and received by both boarders and families.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
