
doi: 10.3828/bhs.2013.27
Several scholars have considered Fernando de Rojas's Celestina to be a parodic representation of the Virgin Mary. By the time Rojas takes up his story, however, the old bawd's power has waned and in Auto XII, she meets her death. This article suggests that Rojas's choice to make Celestina mortal and have her influence decline has critical implications for an understanding of the work within the context of parody. Through a close analysis of her access to power in the social order, I propose that Celestina might be read not in terms of parodia sacra, but as a secular parodic construct; and that the analogy crafted by Rojas is not between Celestina and the Virgin Mary but between Celestina and late-medieval Spain's secular version of the Virgin Mary, the contemporary ‘reyna y senora’, Isabel I of Castile.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
