
doi: 10.3758/bf03336789
Many researchers have questioned the incorporation of utility indices following significant results yielded by the F ratio. Problems frequently mentioned concerning magnitude estimates include biases, questionable model utilization, acceptable size of the UI, and effects of sample size. These issues are addressed and arguments for the inclusion of a magnitude estimate in report writing are tendered. Results of a frequency study on the use of utility measures are included, which show that very few published reports incorporate magnitude estimates.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
