
doi: 10.3758/bf03334222
In two experiments Ss were presented either a list of high- or a list of low-frequency words (unmixed lists), or lists containing equal numbers of words from the two frequency levels (mixed lists). In recall there was a significant interaction between level of frequency and type of list: In unmixed lists high-frequency words were better recalled; in mixed lists low-frequency words were better recalled.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
