
doi: 10.3758/bf03333599
The study was designed to assess the impact of arousal, induced by white noise, upon priming in lexical decisions. The subjects classified letter strings as words or nonwords. “Priming effect” refers to the fact that it takes less time to classify “butter” as a word after making a decision about a related word, like “bread,” than after classifying an unrelated one, like “nurse.” Two hypotheses were compared. (1) The debilitation hypothesis stated that noise would impair all lexical decisions, raising classification times. (2) The enhancement hypothesis stated that arousal (noise) biases the sampling of information toward “dominant” sources, increasing the priming effect. Neither hypothesis received support from the data. Instead, the impact of noise was as follows: Targets were slower than their preceding primes with noise, but there was no difference without it. This interaction suggests that noise makes it difficult to traverse lexical memory from one node to another, regardless of the relatedness of target to prime.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
