
doi: 10.3758/bf03333309
This study examined the influence of serial position of subjects’ affect ratings of stimuli. Ninety subjects saw a serial list of 12 nonsense words repeated two, four, or eight times. Subjects rated the words and then attempted to recall them. Results indicated that: (a) A curvilinear relationship exists between serial position and affect, with first and last items preferred to middle items. (b) Recall is most accurate for the first items in the list. (c) Partially and completely recalled words are preferred to words which were not recalled. (d) After controlling for recall, the curvilinear relationship between serial position and affect still remains.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
