
Posnefs method of using differences in RT for physical and name matches to estimate the time constant of visual STM is criticized as confounding the decay of the visual trace with the development of a name code. When this confounding is avoided by using stimuli that are hard to name (a 5 by 5 matrix of randomly filled squares), the time constant shown by both RT and errors is consistently longer than that reported by Posner.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
