
doi: 10.3758/bf03201161
pmid: 9610123
When asked to recall autobiographical events from the past year, students tend to recall more incidents from the beginning and the end of school terms than from other periods. We investigated this calendar effect in Experiment 1 by comparing free recall at schools with different academic calendars. The event distributions tracked the individual calendars, helping to eliminate the possibility that the calendar effect is due to seasonal, nonschool factors, such as holidays. In Experiments 2-4, we checked explanations based on the ideas that events at term boundaries are more important or distinctive than others, that events are incorrectly dated too near the boundaries, and that boundaries serve as implicit cues for recall. These experiments revealed no evidence that importance or errors in dating could explain the effect. Manipulating cues, however, did change the size of the effect, implicating retrieval from very long-term memory as the effect's source. We suggest that when people have to search episodic memory, they consider their own calendar rhythms (such as a student's academic schedule) and let the temporal structure of their personal context guide their search.
Adult, Male, Association Learning, Retention, Psychology, Achievement, Social Environment, Life Change Events, Autobiographies as Topic, Mental Recall, Time Perception, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Students
Adult, Male, Association Learning, Retention, Psychology, Achievement, Social Environment, Life Change Events, Autobiographies as Topic, Mental Recall, Time Perception, Humans, Attention, Female, Cues, Students
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
