The influence of one memory retrieval on a subsequent memory retrieval

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 May 1974 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Memory & Cognition, volume 2, pages 467-471 (issn: 0090-502X, eissn: 1532-5946,

Copyright policy )

Authors: G R, Loftus; E F, Loftus;

doi: 10.3758/bf03196906

pmid: 21274775

The influence of one memory retrieval on a subsequent memory retrieval

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

Ss produced an instance of a category and following zero or two intervening items produced a second instance of the same category. The second instance was produced more quickly than the initial instance. This finding, in conjunction with other data reported in the paper, indicate that the reduction in latency for the second instance is due mostly to a reduction in the rate with which the category is searched.

Related Organizations

University of Mary
United States
University of Washington
United States

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	50
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average