descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Oct 2007 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, volume 14, pages 877-883 (issn: 1069-9384, eissn: 1531-5320,

Authors: Vincenzo Crupi; Vincenzo Crupi; Vincenzo Crupi; Daniel N. Osherson; Katya Tentori;

doi: 10.3758/bf03194115

pmid: 18087953

handle: 11572/69931 , 2318/80618

Determinants of confirmation

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Epistemologists often suppose that the extent to which evidence e confirms hypothesis H depends on probabilities involving e and H, and nothing more. We show experimentally that human reasoners sometimes violate this assumption.

Related Organizations

View all View all

Keywords

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology, Humans, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Models, Psychological

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	15
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average