Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Journal of Botany
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales)

Authors: Schönenberger J; Conti E;

Molecular phylogeny and floral evolution of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Alzateaceae (Myrtales)

Abstract

We derive detailed relationships among and within the African Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, Rhynchocalycaceae, and Central and South American Alzateaceae based on six chloroplast data sets that include sequences of all genera and most species. This is the first study addressing intrafamilial relationships of Penaeaceae and Oliniaceae based on molecular data. All analyses conducted on the six separate and combined data sets produce similar tree topologies without any major conflicts. The resulting phylogenies suggest that the monospecific New World Alzateaceae is sister to the three African taxa and that the monospecific Rhynchocalycaceae is sister to Oliniaceae/Penaeaceae. Within Penaeaceae, our results partially contradict traditional generic circumscriptions, suggesting, for example, that Brachysiphon and Stylapterus are paraphyletic. Within the monogeneric Oliniaceae the analyses reveal two well‐supported clades. We also performed comparative studies of floral development and morphology of Penaeaceae, Oliniaceae, and Rhynchocalycaceae. We analyze the results of these comparativel studies in the context of the molecular phylogeny to test competing hypotheses of perianth organ homology in Penaeaceae and Oliniaceae. Our analyses show that flowers of both families are most parsimoniously interpreted as having an obhaplostemonous organization. The respective homology of calyx and corolla among the three families is further supported by congruent patterns of floral development and structural similarities including anatomical and histological features.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    65
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
65
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!