
doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600288
pmid: 27999080
PREMISE OF THE STUDY:The lycophyte family Selaginellaceae includes approximately 750 herbaceous species worldwide, with the main species richness in the tropics and subtropics. We recently presented a phylogenetic analysis of Selaginellaceae based on DNA sequence data and, with the phylogeny as a framework, the study discussed the character evolution of the group focusing on gross morphology. Here we translate these findings into a new classification.METHODS:To present a robust and useful classification, we identified well‐supported monophyletic groups from our previous phylogenetic analysis of 223 species, which together represent the diversity of the family with respect to morphology, taxonomy, and geographical distribution. Care was taken to choose groups with supporting morphology.KEY RESULTS:In this classification, we recognize a single genus Selaginella and seven subgenera: Selaginella, Rupestrae, Lepidophyllae, Gymnogynum, Exaltatae, Ericetorum, and Stachygynandrum. The subgenera are all well supported based on analysis of DNA sequence data and morphology. A key to the subgenera is presented.CONCLUSIONS:Our new classification is based on a well‐founded hypothesis of the evolutionary relationships of Selaginella, and each subgenus can be identified by a suite of morphological features, most of them possible to study in the field. Our intention is that the classification will be useful not only to experts in the field, but also to a broader audience.
Selaginellaceae, Biologisk systematik, Botany, Botanik, Biological Systematics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, lycophytes, phylogeny, Biological Evolution, Plant Leaves, classification, key, morphology, subgenera, Phylogeny
Selaginellaceae, Biologisk systematik, Botany, Botanik, Biological Systematics, Sequence Analysis, DNA, lycophytes, phylogeny, Biological Evolution, Plant Leaves, classification, key, morphology, subgenera, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
