
arXiv: 0704.3398
An extensive literature exists describing various techniques for the evaluation of Hankel determinants. The prevailing methods such as Dodgson condensation, continued fraction expansion, LU decomposition, all produce product formulas when they are applicable. We mention the classic case of the Hankel determinants with binomial entries ${3 k +2 \choose k}$ and those with entries ${3 k \choose k}$; both of these classes of Hankel determinants have product form evaluations. The intermediate case, ${3 k +1 \choose k}$ has not been evaluated. There is a good reason for this: these latter determinants do not have product form evaluations. In this paper we evaluate the Hankel determinant of ${3 k +1 \choose k}$. The evaluation is a sum of a small number of products, an almost product. The method actually provides more, and as applications, we present the salient points for the evaluation of a number of other Hankel determinants with polynomial entries, along with product and almost product form evaluations at special points.
Exact enumeration problems, generating functions, Determinants, permanents, traces, other special matrix functions, 05A10, 05A19, 33C45, 33F10, Binomial coefficients; factorials; \(q\)-identities, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 05A15; 05A10, 05A19, 33C45, 33F10, Combinatorics (math.CO), 05A15, Factorials, binomial coefficients, combinatorial functions, Combinatorial identities, bijective combinatorics
Exact enumeration problems, generating functions, Determinants, permanents, traces, other special matrix functions, 05A10, 05A19, 33C45, 33F10, Binomial coefficients; factorials; \(q\)-identities, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 05A15; 05A10, 05A19, 33C45, 33F10, Combinatorics (math.CO), 05A15, Factorials, binomial coefficients, combinatorial functions, Combinatorial identities, bijective combinatorics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
