Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Duzce Üniversitesi A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

EVALUATION OF TRITICALE: GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS

Authors: Güngör, Hüseyin; Çakır, Mehmet Fatih; Dumlupınar, Ziya;

EVALUATION OF TRITICALE: GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS

Abstract

Stability and the preferred response of genotypes over various environments are essential for plant breeders. Six registered cultivars (Truva, Alperbey, Collegial, Karma 2000, Melez 2001 and Tatlıcak 97) and two advanced lines (TR-Trp16 and TR-Avk16) were studied across six environments (E) during two growing seasons in 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 at three locations (Kırklareli, Tekirdağ and Edirne) in Turkey. Genotype (G), genotype × year (G × Y), genotype × location (G × L) and genotype × year × location (G × Y × L) interactions were found significant for all investigated traits. Grain yield of the genotypes ranged from 5539 to 6800 kg ha-1 and cultivar Collegial had the highest grain yield (6800 kg ha-1), while cultivar Melez 2001 had the lowest (5539 kg ha-1). In terms of years, grain yield was higher in 2017 (6466 kg ha-1) and lower in 2018 (6016 kg ha-1). Among the test environments, Edirne was the highest for grain yield (7872 kg ha-1) followed by Kırklareli (5638 kg ha-1) while Tekirdağ was the lowest (5214 kg ha-1). Tekirdağ 2018 was found as the most favourable environment in terms of grain yield. Results revealed that Collegial was the most superior genotype across environments and cultivar Alperbey was the most stable genotype. This study indicates that cultivar improvement efforts should be put on to develop triticale genotypes for the specific environments rather than a broad adaptation. Keywords: Environment, GGE biplot, Grain yield, Stability, Triticale

Country
Turkey
Keywords

Environment; Gge Biplot; Grain Yield; Stability; Triticale, Grain-Yield; Ammi; Quality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
gold