
doi: 10.36446/af.2017.66
handle: 11336/96952
Como han puesto de relieve Evans (1985) y García-Carpintero (2008), uno de los problemas más importantes respecto de la aserción en el marco de una concepción relativista radical de los discursos evaluativos es dar un tratamiento coherente de los compromisos y de las responsabilidades que la aserción misma genera cuando sus condiciones de corrección son inestables. Construyendo sobre la base de un trabajo de Losada (2015), el presente trabajo busca ofrecer dicho tratamiento.
Aserción, problema de evans, relativismo radical, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, Relativismo de La Verdad, Relativismo Radical, Problema de Evans, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, aserción, B1-5802, relativismo de la verdad, Philosophy (General)
Aserción, problema de evans, relativismo radical, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, Relativismo de La Verdad, Relativismo Radical, Problema de Evans, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, aserción, B1-5802, relativismo de la verdad, Philosophy (General)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
