Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Differences Between Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Expression in Fleshy and Atrophy Pterygium

Authors: Reza Satrio; Winarto Winarto; Siti Sundari;

The Differences Between Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Expression in Fleshy and Atrophy Pterygium

Abstract

Background: Pterygium is a conjungtival fibrovascular degenerative process which fleshy type was different to atrophy type, in which post operative recurrencies was high especially fleshy type. The exact pathogenesis were not clearly understood, it was reported that many inflammation mediators had a play role, including Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). Objective of the study was to revealed a different expression of TNF-α in fleshy and atrophy type. Method: Cross-sectional study design have been done with independent variable was TNF-α and dependant vaiable was pterygium type. Samples consist of 20 patients fleshy type and 20 patients atrophy type, both groups were given fluorometholone eye drop for 1 week prior surgery to suppress the degree of inflammation. The baseline data was recorded e.g. demography, the size of pterygium, Tear Break Up Time (TBUT), Schirmer test and Ferning test. Pterygium excission followed by limbal stem cell graft, and examination of TNF-α expression by immunohistochemistry. TNF-α expression was analyzed using 2 x 2 table. Result: Baseline data of both groups were not significantly different, except TBUT (p=0.000) and the clinical characteristic of pterygium (p=0.000). TNF-α expression in fleshy type tend to be higher (total Allred score mean 4.70) but not significantly different than atrophic type (total Allred score mean 4.54 and p=0.61). Previous fluorometholone treatment prior to surgery might be suppressed the inflammatory cytokine. Conclusion: No significant difference of the TNF-α expressions between fleshy and atrophy type of pterygium. Keywords: pterygium, fleshy type, atrophy type, TNF-α, immunohistochemistry

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!