Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, A Predictable Complication?

O Síndrome Da Ressecção Anterior Baixa É Uma Complicação Previsível?
Authors: Amado, Fabíola; Valente, André; Ferreira, Alexandra; Correia, Débora; Lamas, Marta; Cortez, Luís;

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, A Predictable Complication?

Abstract

 Introduction: Rectal cancer is the fifth most frequent neoplasm in both sexes in Portugal. With the evolution of preoperative imaging tests, surgical techniques and neoadjuvant therapy, anterior rectal resection (ARR) has become the gold standard in the treatment of this condition. Nevertheless, functional outcomes arise, namely the development of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS). It is defined as LARS major when the LARS SCORE is calculated and a value greater than 30 is obtained. This study aims to determine the incidence of LARS in patients undergoing ARR for rectal cancer treatment at the Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal and to identify LARS predictors. Methods: A cohort retrospective study was conducted in rectal cancer patients electively undergoing ARR, from January 2019 to December 2020. The LARS diagnosis was made by applying the LARS score. Risk factors were assessed using the software SPSS® (Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test). Results: The studied population consisted of 60 patients, of whom 32 (53.3%) had LARS, and 6 patients (6.6%) had major LARS. Low intestinal anastomosis ( <0.001) and ileostomy ( <0.001) were identified as statistically significant LARS predictors. Conclusions: These results show that some clinical variables should be considered as predictive factors of LARS and need to be evaluated preoperatively when deciding which treatment to perform in each patient’s rectal cancer.

Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia, No 57 (2024): July

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!