
doi: 10.34298/ic2069189k
У раду се, у светлости новог тумачења да је у питању плод хуманистичке историографије, а не аутентичан средњовековни спис, истражује порекло података у тзв. Летопису попа Дукљанина кроз дела дубровачке хуманистичке историографије, почев од Лудовика Цријевића Туберона, који се први позива на „писца Дукљанина“, до Мавра Орбина, који први објављује наводни текст „Дукљаниновог“ списа на италијанском. In the light of the new interpretation that the so-called Chronicle of the Priest of Dioclea is a product of humanist historiography, rather than an authentic medieval source, the origin of its data is examined through the works of Ragusan humanist historiography, starting from Ludovicus Cerva Tubero, who first referred to the “author Diocleas”, up to Mauro Orbin, who first published the purported text of the work of "Diocleas" in Italian.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
