
This paper analyses the choice of a farmer to be an innovator, an early adopter or a laggard (an adopter of mature technologies or a non-adopter) in the adoption of innovations that are available on the market. We estimate a nested logit model with data from a large sample of Dutch farmers. We find that structural characteristics (farm size, market position, solvency, age of the farmer) explain the difference in adoption behaviour between innovators and early adopters on the one hand and laggards on the other. We also find that early adopters and innovators do not differ from each other regarding these structural characteristics. However ; they appear to differ in behavioural characteristics : innovators make more use of external sources of information and they are more involved in the actual development of innovations.
innovation, adoption, nested logit model, agriculture, The Netherlands, Agricultural and Food Policy,, 330, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, innovation, adoption, nested logit model, agriculture, The Netherlands, modèle logit ; agriculture ; Pays-Bas ; diffusion d'une innovation, [SHS.HIST] Humanities and Social Sciences/History, The Netherlands ; innovation ; adoption ; nested logit model ; agriculture, Life Science, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
innovation, adoption, nested logit model, agriculture, The Netherlands, Agricultural and Food Policy,, 330, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, innovation, adoption, nested logit model, agriculture, The Netherlands, modèle logit ; agriculture ; Pays-Bas ; diffusion d'une innovation, [SHS.HIST] Humanities and Social Sciences/History, The Netherlands ; innovation ; adoption ; nested logit model ; agriculture, Life Science, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
