
Detection and quantification of pathogenic free-living amoebae (FLA) in water samples is critical for assessing water quality and for disease management issues. The most probable number (MPN) is commonly used to account for FLA in water. Nevertheless, this requires a high number of water replicates and working volumes, and a consequent number of non-nutrient agar (NNA)-plates seeded with Escherichia coli. Herein, we aimed at optimizing this difficult method, taking also into account key factors such as (i) the counting method, (ii) the delay between sample collection and sample processing, and (iii) the temperature during water sample transportation. To simplify the MPN method, we filtrated 1 × 1000 and 1 × 100 mL water samples, and cellulose acetate filters were cut in 10 parts and inverted on NNA-plates overlaid with E. coli. The comparison between the classical and our optimized MPN method showed that the final counts were similar, therefore validating the use of the optimized method. Our results also showed that for thermophilic FLA (such as Naegleria fowleri), water samples can be kept at around +30°C and processed within 24 h. This improved MPN method is now routinely used in our laboratory to control Naegleria sp. in the water samples in Guadeloupe.
<i>Naegleria fowleri</i>, Communication, R, [SDV.EE.IEO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Symbiosis, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], most probable number (MPN), [SDV.EE.SANT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Health, Medicine, free-living amoebae, thermophilic amoebae, [SDV.BC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology, Naegleria fowleri, optimized quantification method
<i>Naegleria fowleri</i>, Communication, R, [SDV.EE.IEO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Symbiosis, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], most probable number (MPN), [SDV.EE.SANT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Health, Medicine, free-living amoebae, thermophilic amoebae, [SDV.BC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology, Naegleria fowleri, optimized quantification method
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
