
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic endocrine disease resulted from insulin secretory defect or insulin resistance and it is a leading cause of death around the world. The care of DM patients consumes a huge budget due to the high frequency of consultations and long hospitalizations, making DM a serious threat to both human health and global economies. Tea contains abundant polyphenols and caffeine which showed antidiabetic activity, so the development of antidiabetic medications from tea and its extracts is increasingly receiving attention. However, the results claiming an association between tea consumption and reduced DM risk are inconsistent. The advances in the epidemiologic evidence and the underlying antidiabetic mechanisms of tea are reviewed in this paper. The inconsistent results and the possible causes behind them are also discussed.
Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitative, Organic chemistry, Review, Camellia sinensis, Catechin, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, QD241-441, Caffeine, Diabetes Mellitus, Animals, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, caffeine, Flavonoids, tea catechins, Tea, Polyphenols, tea polysaccharides, Epidemiologic Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, diabetes mellitus, epidemiological analysis, Insulin Resistance
Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitative, Organic chemistry, Review, Camellia sinensis, Catechin, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, QD241-441, Caffeine, Diabetes Mellitus, Animals, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, caffeine, Flavonoids, tea catechins, Tea, Polyphenols, tea polysaccharides, Epidemiologic Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, diabetes mellitus, epidemiological analysis, Insulin Resistance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
