
The abundant fruit hulls of tea-oil tree (Camellia oleifera) are still underutilized and wastefully discaded to pollute the environment. In order to solve this problem and better utilize the fruit hulls of C. oleifera, a microwave-assisted extraction system was used to extract their polyphenols using water as the extraction solvent. A central composite design (CCD) was used to monitor the effects of three extraction processing parameters – liquid:solid ratio (mL/g), extraction time (min) and extraction temperature (°C) – on the polyphenol yield (%). The results showed that the optimal conditions were liquid:solid ratio of 15.33:1 (mL/g), extraction time of 35 min and extraction temperature of 76 °C. Validation tests indicated that under the optimized conditions the actual yield of polyphenols was 15.05 ± 0.04% with RSD = 0.21% (n = 5), which was in good agreement with the predicted yield. Phenolic compounds in the extracts were analysed by HPLC, and gallic acid was found to be the predominant constituent. The total flavonoid content in the extracts was determined and high total flavonoid content was revealed (140.06 mg/g dry material).
Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Organic chemistry, Polyphenols, Reproducibility of Results, Camellia, Camellia oleifera, microwave-assisted extraction, Article, response surface methodology, QD241-441, Phenols, <em>Camellia oleifera</em>; polyphenols; microwave-assisted extraction; response surface methodology, Fruit, Microwaves, polyphenols, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Organic chemistry, Polyphenols, Reproducibility of Results, Camellia, Camellia oleifera, microwave-assisted extraction, Article, response surface methodology, QD241-441, Phenols, <em>Camellia oleifera</em>; polyphenols; microwave-assisted extraction; response surface methodology, Fruit, Microwaves, polyphenols, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
