Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3390/math9111219
In this paper, we introduce two approaches to compute the matrix hyperbolic tangent. While one of them is based on its own definition and uses the matrix exponential, the other one is focused on the expansion of its Taylor series. For this second approximation, we analyse two different alternatives to evaluate the corresponding matrix polynomials. This resulted in three stable and accurate codes, which we implemented in MATLAB and numerically and computationally compared by means of a battery of tests composed of distinct state-of-the-art matrices. Our results show that the Taylor series-based methods were more accurate, although somewhat more computationally expensive, compared with the approach based on the exponential matrix. To avoid this drawback, we propose the use of a set of formulas that allows us to evaluate polynomials in a more efficient way compared with that of the traditional Paterson–Stockmeyer method, thus, substantially reducing the number of matrix products (practically equal in number to the approach based on the matrix exponential), without penalising the accuracy of the result.
Matrix functions, Matrix exponential, matrix functions, matrix hyperbolic tangent, matrix exponential, Matrix polynomial evaluation, matrix polynomial evaluation, Matrix hyperbolic tangent, TEORIA DE LA SEÑAL Y COMUNICACIONES, QA1-939, Taylor series, CIENCIAS DE LA COMPUTACION E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL, MATEMATICA APLICADA, Mathematics
Matrix functions, Matrix exponential, matrix functions, matrix hyperbolic tangent, matrix exponential, Matrix polynomial evaluation, matrix polynomial evaluation, Matrix hyperbolic tangent, TEORIA DE LA SEÑAL Y COMUNICACIONES, QA1-939, Taylor series, CIENCIAS DE LA COMPUTACION E INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL, MATEMATICA APLICADA, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 48 | |
| downloads | 114 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts