
doi: 10.3390/math9030260
The aim of this paper is to present a new method and the tool to validate the numerical results of the Volterra integral equation with discontinuous kernels in linear and non-linear forms obtained from the Adomian decomposition method. Because of disadvantages of the traditional absolute error to show the accuracy of the mathematical methods which is based on the floating point arithmetic, we apply the stochastic arithmetic and new condition to study the efficiency of the method which is based on two successive approximations. Thus the CESTAC method (Controle et Estimation Stochastique des Arrondis de Calculs) and the CADNA (Control of Accuracy and Debugging for Numerical Applications) library are employed. Finding the optimal iteration of the method, optimal approximation and the optimal error are some of advantages of the stochastic arithmetic, the CESTAC method and the CADNA library in comparison with the floating point arithmetic and usual packages. The theorems are proved to show the convergence analysis of the Adomian decomposition method for solving the mentioned problem. Also, the main theorem of the CESTAC method is presented which shows the equality between the number of common significant digits between exact and approximate solutions and two successive approximations.This makes in possible to apply the new termination criterion instead of absolute error. Several examples in both linear and nonlinear cases are solved and the numerical results for the stochastic arithmetic and the floating-point arithmetic are compared to demonstrate the accuracy of the novel method.
volterra integral equation, floating-point arithmetic, stochastic arithmetic, CESTAC method, QA1-939, Adomian decomposition method, CADNA library, Mathematics, discontinuous kernel
volterra integral equation, floating-point arithmetic, stochastic arithmetic, CESTAC method, QA1-939, Adomian decomposition method, CADNA library, Mathematics, discontinuous kernel
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 55 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
