
arXiv: 1802.02928
The analysis of the real observations of precipitation based on the novel statistical approach using the negative binomial distribution as a model for describing the random duration of a wet period is considered and discussed. The study shows that this distribution fits very well to the real observations and generalized standard methods used in meteorology to detect an extreme volume of precipitation. It also provides a theoretical base for the determination of asymptotic approximations to the distributions of the maximum daily precipitation volume within a wet period, as well as the total precipitation volume over a wet period. The paper demonstrates that the relation of the unique precipitation volume, having the gamma distribution, divided by the total precipitation volume taken over the wet period is given by the Snedecor–Fisher or beta distributions. It allows us to construct statistical tests to determine the extreme precipitations. Within this approach, it is possible to introduce the notions of relatively and absolutely extreme precipitation volumes. An alternative method to determine an extreme daily precipitation volume based on a certain quantile of the tempered Snedecor–Fisher distribution is also suggested. The results of the application of these methods to real data are presented.
total precipitation volume, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Probability (math.PR), random sample size, testing statistical hypotheses, extreme order statistics, Methodology (stat.ME), QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, asymptotic approximation, wet periods, Mathematics, Statistics - Methodology, Mathematics - Probability
total precipitation volume, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Probability (math.PR), random sample size, testing statistical hypotheses, extreme order statistics, Methodology (stat.ME), QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, asymptotic approximation, wet periods, Mathematics, Statistics - Methodology, Mathematics - Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
