
doi: 10.3390/math10101726
The idea of bipolar complex fuzzy (BCF) sets, as a genuine modification of both bipolar fuzzy sets and complex fuzzy sets, gives a massive valuable framework for representing and evaluating ambiguous information. In intelligence decision making based on BCF sets, it is a critical dilemma to compare or rank positive and negative membership grades. In this framework, we deliberated various techniques for aggregating the collection of information into a singleton set, called BCF weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFWAA), BCF ordered weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFOWAA), BCF weighted geometric averaging (BCFWGA), and BCF ordered weighted geometric averaging (BCFOWGA) operators for BCF numbers (BCFNs). To illustrate the feasibility and original worth of the diagnosed approaches, we demonstrated various properties of the diagnosed operators, in addition to their capability that the evaluated value of a set of BCF numbers is a unique BCF number. Further, multiattribute decision making (“MADM”) refers to a technique employed to compute a brief and dominant assessment of opinions with multiattributes. The main influence of this theory is implementing the diagnosed theory in the field of the MADM tool using BCF settings. Finally, a benchmark dilemma is used for comparison with various prevailing techniques to justify the cogency and dominancy of the evaluated operators.
support decision-making techniques, QA1-939, bipolar complex fuzzy settings, averaging/geometric aggregation operators, Mathematics, bipolar complex fuzzy settings; averaging/geometric aggregation operators; support decision-making techniques
support decision-making techniques, QA1-939, bipolar complex fuzzy settings, averaging/geometric aggregation operators, Mathematics, bipolar complex fuzzy settings; averaging/geometric aggregation operators; support decision-making techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
