
Discrepancies in the published research as to the attraction of the economically important pest western flower thrips (WFT) to different colours confounds the optimisation of field traps for pest management purposes. We considered whether the different experimental conditions of independent studies could have contributed to this. Therefore, the behavioural response (i.e., landings) to different colour cues of two WFT laboratory populations from Germany (DE) and The Netherlands (NL), which had previously been independently shown to have different colour preferences, were tested in the same place, and under the same experimental conditions. Single-choice wind tunnel bioassays supported previous independent findings, with more of a NL population landing on the yellow LED lamp (588 nm) than the blue (470 nm) (p = 0.022), and a not-statistically significant trend observed in a DE population landing more on blue compared to yellow (p = 0.104). To account for potential original host rearing influences, both populations were subsequently established on bean for ~20 weeks, then yellow chrysanthemum for 4–8 and 12–14 weeks and tested in wind tunnel choice bioassays. Laboratory of origin, irrespective of the host plant rearing regime, remained a significant effect (p < 0.001), with 65% of the NL WFT landing on yellow compared to blue (35%), while 66% of the DE WFT landed on blue compared to yellow (34%). There was also a significant host plant effect (p < 0.001), with increased response to yellow independent of laboratory of origin after rearing on chrysanthemum for 12–14 weeks. Results suggest that differing responses of WFT populations to colour is, in this case, independent of the experimental situation. Long-term separate isolation from the wild cannot be excluded as a cause, and the implications of this for optimising the trap colour is discussed.
570, ANZSRC::300804 Horticultural crop protection (incl. pests, Frankliniella occidentalis, Science, ANZSRC::310307 Population ecology, Q, wind tunnel, diseases and weeds), ANZSRC::319999 Other biological sciences not elsewhere classified, trapping, 630, Article, behaviour, thrips, ANZSRC::340102 Bioassays, colour choice-test, ANZSRC::310901 Animal behaviour, ANZSRC::3109 Zoology, <i>Frankliniella occidentalis</i>
570, ANZSRC::300804 Horticultural crop protection (incl. pests, Frankliniella occidentalis, Science, ANZSRC::310307 Population ecology, Q, wind tunnel, diseases and weeds), ANZSRC::319999 Other biological sciences not elsewhere classified, trapping, 630, Article, behaviour, thrips, ANZSRC::340102 Bioassays, colour choice-test, ANZSRC::310901 Animal behaviour, ANZSRC::3109 Zoology, <i>Frankliniella occidentalis</i>
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
