Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forestsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forests
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forests
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Estimation of the Aboveground Carbon Storage of Dendrocalamus giganteus Based on Spaceborne Lidar Co-Kriging

Authors: Huanfen Yang; Zhen Qin; Qingtai Shu; Lei Xi; Cuifen Xia; Zaikun Wu; Mingxing Wang; +1 Authors

Estimation of the Aboveground Carbon Storage of Dendrocalamus giganteus Based on Spaceborne Lidar Co-Kriging

Abstract

Bamboo forests, as some of the integral components of forest ecosystems, have emerged as focal points in forestry research due to their rapid growth and substantial carbon sequestration capacities. In this paper, satellite-borne lidar data from GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS are utilized as the main information sources, with Landsat 9 and DEM data as covariates, combined with 51 pieces of ground-measured data. Using random forest regression (RFR), boosted regression tree (BRT), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), Cubist, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and Stacking-ridge regression (RR) machine learning methods, an aboveground carbon (AGC) storage model was constructed at a regional scale. The model evaluation indices were the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and overall estimation accuracy (P). The results showed that (1) The best-fit semivariogram models for cdem, fdem, fndvi, pdem, and andvi were Gaussian models, while those for h1b7, h2b7, h3b7, and h4b7 were spherical models; (2) According to Pearson correlation analysis, the AGC of Dendrocalamus giganteus showed an extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01) with cdem and pdem from GEDI, and also showed an extremely significant correlation with andvi, h1b7, h2b7, h3b7, and h4b7 from ICESat-2/ATLAS; moreover, AGC showed a significant correlation (0.01 < p < 0.05) with fdem and fndvi from GEDI; (3) The estimation accuracy of the GEDI model was superior to that of the ICESat-2/ATLAS model; additionally, the estimation accuracy of the Stacking-RR model, which integrates GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS (R2 = 0.92, RMSE = 5.73 Mg/ha, p = 86.19%), was better than that of any single model (XGBoost, RFR, BRT, KNN, Cubist); (4) Based on the Stacking-RR model, the estimated AGC of Dendrocalamus giganteus within the study area was 1.02 × 107 Mg. The average AGC was 43.61 Mg/ha, with a maximum value of 76.43 Mg/ha and a minimum value of 15.52 Mg/ha. This achievement can serve as a reference for estimating other bamboo species using GEDI and ICESat-2/ATLAS remote sensing technologies and provide decision support for the scientific operation and management of Dendrocalamus giganteus.

Related Organizations
Keywords

ICESat-2/ATLAS, Landsat 9, Stacking-RR, <i>Dendrocalamus giganteus</i>, aboveground carbon storage, Co-Kriging, GEDI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold