Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Forestsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Forests
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Wood Density and Carbon Concentration Jointly Drive Wood Carbon Density of Five Rosaceae Tree Species

Authors: Pingping Guo; Xiping Zhao; Xingchang Wang; Qi Feng; Xinjing Li; Yangyang Tan;

Wood Density and Carbon Concentration Jointly Drive Wood Carbon Density of Five Rosaceae Tree Species

Abstract

Wood can store carbon and help mitigate global climate change. Carbon density (CD), the basis for measuring and analyzing C storage, is the product of wood density (WD) and C concentration, which are dependent on wood structure, cellulose concentration (CC), hemicellulose concentration (HC), and lignin concentration (LC). However, little attention has been paid to the C concentration of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which are fundamental factors in C storage and affect the credibility of accurate CD estimates. In order to disentangle the CD drives, WD, C concentration, CC, HC, and LC of the branch, stem, and root were quantified for five Rosaceae species from temperate forests in Northeastern China. The species were Sorbus alnifolia (Sieb.et Zucc.) K. Koch, Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim., Malus baccata (L.) Borkh., Crataegus pinnatifida var. major N. E. Brown, and Padus racemosa (Linn.) Gilib. The WD, CC, HC, and LC differed among species and tree organs, with the highest variability for the HC. The structural carbon concentration (SCC) was lower than the organic carbon concentration (OCC) and even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default value of 45%, with a maximum deviation of 2.6%. CD differed dramatically among species and tree organs. Based on SCC calculations, the highest CD was found in Sorbus alnifolia root (0.27 × 106 g/m3), while the lowest was found in Padus racemosa branch (0.22 × 106 g/m3). The results suggest that when estimating CD accurately at species level, it is important to consider not only WD but also structural carbohydrates and lignin concentration, providing important information on C fluxes and long-term C sequestration for forests. The study findings provide valuable insights into CD variations among tree species and organs and are valuable for forest management and policy development to improve carbon sequestration.

Related Organizations
Keywords

carbon concentration, carbon density, wood density, <i>Rosaceae</i> tree species

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
gold