
The use of Neural Networks in quantum many-body theory has undergone a formidable rise in recent years. Among the many possible applications, their pattern recognition power can be utilized when dealing with the study of equilibrium phase diagrams. Learning by Confusion has emerged as an interesting and unbiased scheme within this context. This technique involves systematically reassigning labels to the data in various ways, followed by training and testing the Neural Network. While random labeling results in low accuracy, the method reveals a peak in accuracy when the data are correctly and meaningfully partitioned, even if the correct labeling is initially unknown. Here, we propose a generalization of this confusion scheme for systems with more than two phases, for which it was originally proposed. Our construction relies on the use of a slightly different Neural Network: from a binary classifier, we move to a ternary one, which is more suitable to detect systems exhibiting three phases. After introducing this construction, we test it on free and interacting Kitaev chains and on the one-dimensional Extended Hubbard model, consistently achieving results that are compatible with previous works. Our work opens the way to wider use of Learning by Confusion, demonstrating once more the usefulness of Machine Learning to address quantum many-body problems.
QB460-466, condensed matter, phases of matter; neural networks; quantum many-body physics, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, quantum many-body physics, neural networks, Astrophysics, Article
QB460-466, condensed matter, phases of matter; neural networks; quantum many-body physics, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, quantum many-body physics, neural networks, Astrophysics, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
