
In this paper, the results of computer simulations based on the Nowak–Szamrej–Latané model with multiple (from two to five) opinions available in the system are presented. We introduce the noise discrimination level (which says how small the clusters of agents could be considered negligible) as a quite useful quantity that allows qualitative characterization of the system. We show that depending on the introduced noise discrimination level, the range of actors’ interactions (controlled indirectly by an exponent in the distance scaling function, the larger the exponent, the more influential the nearest neighbors are) and the information noise level (modeled as social temperature, which increases results in the increase in randomness in taking the opinion by the agents), the ultimate number of the opinions (measured as the number of clusters of actors sharing the same opinion in clusters greater than the noise discrimination level) may be smaller than the number of opinions available in the system. These are observed in small and large information noise limits but result in either unanimity, or polarization, or randomization of opinions.
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Astrophysics, Article, QB460-466, clusterization and polarization, information noise, sociophysics, social impact, opinion dynamics
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Astrophysics, Article, QB460-466, clusterization and polarization, information noise, sociophysics, social impact, opinion dynamics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
