
We showed how to use trained neural networks to perform Bayesian reasoning in order to solve tasks outside their initial scope. Deep generative models provide prior knowledge, and classification/regression networks impose constraints. The tasks at hand were formulated as Bayesian inference problems, which we approximately solved through variational or sampling techniques. The approach built on top of already trained networks, and the addressable questions grew super-exponentially with the number of available networks. In its simplest form, the approach yielded conditional generative models. However, multiple simultaneous constraints constitute elaborate questions. We compared the approach to specifically trained generators, showed how to solve riddles, and demonstrated its compatibility with state-of-the-art architectures.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, generative models, uncertainty quantification, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, deep learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Astrophysics, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Statistics - Machine Learning, reasoning
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Machine Learning, generative models, uncertainty quantification, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, deep learning, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Astrophysics, Article, Machine Learning (cs.LG), QB460-466, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Statistics - Machine Learning, reasoning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
