
In this paper, we deal with the classical Statistical Learning Theory’s problem of bounding, with high probability, the true risk R(h) of a hypothesis h chosen from a set H of m hypotheses. The Union Bound (UB) allows one to state that PLR^(h),δqh≤R(h)≤UR^(h),δph≥1−δ where R^(h) is the empirical errors, if it is possible to prove that P{R(h)≥L(R^(h),δ)}≥1−δ and P{R(h)≤U(R^(h),δ)}≥1−δ, when h, qh, and ph are chosen before seeing the data such that qh,ph∈[0,1] and ∑h∈H(qh+ph)=1. If no a priori information is available qh and ph are set to 12m, namely equally distributed. This approach gives poor results since, as a matter of fact, a learning procedure targets just particular hypotheses, namely hypotheses with small empirical error, disregarding the others. In this work we set the qh and ph in a distribution-dependent way increasing the probability of being chosen to function with small true risk. We will call this proposal Distribution-Dependent Weighted UB (DDWUB) and we will retrieve the sufficient conditions on the choice of qh and ph that state that DDWUB outperforms or, in the worst case, degenerates into UB. Furthermore, theoretical and numerical results will show the applicability, the validity, and the potentiality of DDWUB.
union bound, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, distribution-dependent weights, Astrophysics, Article, finite number of hypothesis, QB460-466, statistical learning theory, weighted union bound, Distribution-dependent weights; Finite number of hypothesis; Statistical learning theory; Union bound; Weighted union bound
union bound, Science, Physics, QC1-999, Q, distribution-dependent weights, Astrophysics, Article, finite number of hypothesis, QB460-466, statistical learning theory, weighted union bound, Distribution-dependent weights; Finite number of hypothesis; Statistical learning theory; Union bound; Weighted union bound
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
