
Inference after model selection is a very important problem. Model selection algorithms for ARIMA time series, with criteria such as AIC and BIC, tend to select an inconsistent model with positive probability, making data-splitting inference for testing and confidence intervals unreliable. One technique was fairly reliable for sample sizes greater than 600, and a modification also worked. Model selection is often useful for prediction, since the selected submodel tends to have fitted values and residuals that are highly correlated with those of the full model. A few prediction intervals perform fairly well even after model selection. A useful technique for handling outliers is to replace the outliers with missing values.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
