Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Applied Sciencesarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Applied Sciences
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Applied Sciences
Article . 2024
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

High Strain Rate Response of Sandstones with Different Porosity under Dynamic Loading Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB)

Authors: Grzegorz Stopka; Roman Gieleta; Robert Panowicz; Daniel Wałach; Grzegorz Piotr Kaczmarczyk;

High Strain Rate Response of Sandstones with Different Porosity under Dynamic Loading Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB)

Abstract

This article presents the results of dynamic tests of sandstone samples differing in strength parameters and porosity, which were carried out with the use of the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB). For this study, three types of sandstones were considered: two from the region of India (Kandla Grey and Apricot Pink) and one from Central Europe (Barwald). The strength parameters of the samples were identified in static tests (UCS, BTS tests), whereas the porosity was measured using computed tomography. The performed scanning allowed the volume of the pores and their distribution in the samples to be identified. Dynamic tests involved loading the cylindrical samples with a diameter of 23 m in the range of high strain rates, i.e., ε˙ = 102 ÷ 103/s, using the SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) method. Samples with three different values of slenderness were used for testing (L/D = 1, 0.75 and 0.5). Based on the dynamic characteristics of the samples, the maximum dynamic stresses, Dynamic Increase Factor (DIF) and the amount of energy absorbed by the samples were determined. The conducted research indicates a significant impact of material porosity on the amount of dissipated energy under conditions of high strain rates. The research indicates that the values of this parameter for Apricot Pink and Kandla Grey sandstones (slenderness L/D = ¾ and L/D = ½) are similar, although the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of Kandla Grey sandstone is approximately 60% higher than that of Apricot Pink sandstone. As a result of the sample destruction process, various forms of sample destruction were obtained. The performed grain analysis indicates a significant increase in the smallest fraction (<0.5 mm) in the case of the sandstone with the highest porosity (Apricot Pink—55% of mass outcome) in comparison to the sandstone with the lowest porosity (Kandla Grey—12% of mass outcome).

Keywords

SHPB test, Technology, porosity, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), strain rate effect, Chemistry, sandstone, TA1-2040, Biology (General), QD1-999

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
gold