
pmid: 25161636
pmc: PMC4130197
We report two experiments attempting to identify the role of semantic relatedness in picture-word interference studies. Previously published data sets have rendered results which directly contradict each other, with one study suggesting that the stronger the relation between picture and distractor, the more semantic interference is obtained, and another study suggesting the opposite pattern. We replicated the two key experiments with only minor procedural modifications, and found semantic interference effects in both. Critically, these were largely independent of the strength of semantic overlap. Additionally, we attempted to predict individual interference effects per target picture, via various measures of semantic overlap, which also failed to account for the effects. From our results it appears that semantic interference effects in picture-word tasks are similarly present for weakly and strongly overlapping combinations. Implications are discussed in the light of the recent debate on the role of competition in lexical selection.
TIME DISTRIBUTIONS, object naming, lexical access, 150, STROOP TASK, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, FACILITATION, picture-word interference, Spoken production, SPEECH PRODUCTION, BF1-990, name=Language, PARADIGM, spoken production, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_language, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, RESPONSE EXCLUSION HYPOTHESIS, Psychology, competition, LEMMA RETRIEVAL
TIME DISTRIBUTIONS, object naming, lexical access, 150, STROOP TASK, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, FACILITATION, picture-word interference, Spoken production, SPEECH PRODUCTION, BF1-990, name=Language, PARADIGM, spoken production, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_language, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, RESPONSE EXCLUSION HYPOTHESIS, Psychology, competition, LEMMA RETRIEVAL
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
