
doi: 10.3386/w4313
handle: 10230/20837
To explain the large differences in labor productivity across U.S. states we estimate two models-one based on local geographical externalities and the other on the diversity of local intermediate services-where spatial density results in aggregate increasing returns. Both models lead to a relation between county employment density and productivity at the state level. Using data on gross state output we find that a doubling of employment density increases average labor productivity by around 6 percent. More than half of the variance of output per worker across states can be explained by differences in the density of economic activity. (JEL RIO)
Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:O47
Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:O47
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 266 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
