Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10016/4667 , 10016/316 , 10419/20364
Job security provisions are commonly invoked to explain the high and persistent European unemployment rates. This belief has led several countries to reform their labor markets and liberalize the use of fixed-term contracts. Despite how common such contracts have become after deregulation, there is a lack of quantitative analysis of their impact on the economy. To fill this gap, we build a general equilibrium model with heterogeneous agents and firing costs in the tradition of Hopenhayn and Rogerson (1993). We calibrate our model to Spanish data, choosing in part parameters estimated with firm-level longitudinal data. Spain is particularly interesting, since its labor regulations are among the most protective in the OECD, and both its unemployment and its share of fixed-term employment are the highest. We find that fixedterm contracts increase unemployment, reduce output, and raise productivity. The welfare effects are ambiguous.
330, Economía, Heterogeneous agents, Wohlfahrtseffekt, J30, fixed-term contracts, general equilibrium, Firing costs, Spanien, ddc:330, Fixed-term contracts, Firing costs, General equilibrium, Heterogeneous agents, Allgemeines Gleichgewicht, General equilibrium, firing costs, Kündigung, Kosten, Befristeter Arbeitsvertrag, Fixed-term contracts, C68, Arbeitsmarktflexibilisierung, Wirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyse, E24, heterogeneous agents, Theorie, jel: jel:C68, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J30
330, Economía, Heterogeneous agents, Wohlfahrtseffekt, J30, fixed-term contracts, general equilibrium, Firing costs, Spanien, ddc:330, Fixed-term contracts, Firing costs, General equilibrium, Heterogeneous agents, Allgemeines Gleichgewicht, General equilibrium, firing costs, Kündigung, Kosten, Befristeter Arbeitsvertrag, Fixed-term contracts, C68, Arbeitsmarktflexibilisierung, Wirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyse, E24, heterogeneous agents, Theorie, jel: jel:C68, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J30
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 27 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts