
doi: 10.3382/ps.0750677
pmid: 8722918
The objective of this research was to determine effects of stunning duration and polyphosphates on color, pH, and texture of chicken breast meat. Sixty broiler chickens were electrically stunned for 2 to 10 s in 2-s intervals and then slaughtered. Left and right Pectoralis major muscles were excised 1 h post-mortem. The left muscles (treated) were treated with a sodium tripolyphosphate salt solution, and the right muscles (controls) were treated with a salt solution alone. All muscles were cooked to an endpoint temperature of 72 C in a 95 C water bath. Measurements of muscle pH were taken on the meat 1 h post-mortem, after treating, and after cooking. Color values and Warner-Bratzler shear values were evaluated on each cooked meat sample. As stunning time increased, pH increased at 1 h post-mortem but treating with either of the solutions eliminated this trend. Muscle pH also increased upon cooking except in the polyphosphate-treated muscles, because the latter muscles achieved maximum pH prior to cooking. Stunning had no apparent effect on color values of the cooked meat; however, polyphosphate treatment resulted in meat that was darker and less red than controls. Longer stunning times resulted in greater shear values but polyphosphates did not affect Warner-Bratzler results. Taken together, these data suggest that processing variables that affect muscle pH also affect quality attributes.
Male, Restraint, Physical, Meat, Time Factors, Color, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Thorax, Electricity, Polyphosphates, Animals, Food Technology, Female, Chickens
Male, Restraint, Physical, Meat, Time Factors, Color, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Thorax, Electricity, Polyphosphates, Animals, Food Technology, Female, Chickens
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
