Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Poultry Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Poultry Science
Article . 1986 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Poultry Science
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Technical Efficiency in Turkey Production

Authors: WILLIAM GRISLEY; WILLIAM L. HENSON;

Technical Efficiency in Turkey Production

Abstract

Abstract Technical efficiency of operating input utilization for 165 hen and 200 tom turkey flocks was measured using the Farrell efficient unit isoquant technique. For each sample by sex, flocks were arrayed by whether they fell into the range of increasing (IRS), constant (CRS), or decreasing (DRS) returns to size. Technical efficiency was measured for each flock by IRS, CRS, and DRS group. Results showed all groups to be highly efficient on average, with mean values of technical efficiency ranging from 93.6 to 97.0%. Hypothesis tests for equality of means showed no significant difference between CRS and DRS groups and between CRS and IRS groups for the hen flocks. The CRS group had a significantly smaller mean than the DRS group. For toms, the CRS group had a significantly larger mean than the IRS group and a significantly smaller mean than the DRS group. Grower payment, received per pound of marketable turkey produced, was regressed on the measures of technical efficiency and other identifiable characteristics of the flocks. A 1% increase in technical efficiency resulted in increases of $.0017 and $.0018/pound in grower payments for hen and tom flocks, respectively. At the mean grower payment, this represents increases of $217.42/flock for hens and $407.07/flock for toms. Assuming a 1% increase in efficiency translates into a 1% reduction in contractor operating input production costs, the total benefit from a 1% increase in efficiency was $510.95/flock for hens and $909.96/flock for toms. Hen and tom growers received 43 and 45% of the benefits, respectively. Relationships between some of the other flock characteristics and grower payment were significant, but their independent effects were relatively small.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold