
doi: 10.3382/ps.0321074
Abstract THE efficiency with which a growing animal uses its feed is usually expressed either as the ratio of the gain in live weight to the weight of feed consumed or as the ratio of the weight of feed consumed to the gain in live weight. That is to say, the efficiency of feed utilization is usually measured either by the gain made per unit weight of feed consumed or by the feed required per unit weight of gain made. Inasmuch as the one ratio is the reciprocal of the other, it is obvious that both of them should not be referred to as “efficiencies.” Fortunately, there is a growing tendency to refer to the second ratio (namely, feed per unit weight of gain) as “feed conversion.” The writers urge that the first ratio (namely, gain per unit weight of feed) be referred to as “efficiency of feed utilization” or as …
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
