
This article returns to the release of ChatGPT to study the mechanics of Large Language Models (LLMs) and to counterpose them against established theories of language and writing. Its aim is to explore the hypothesis that ‘generated writing’ is “the beginning of new writing”, a writing that has its own cultural logic and tendencies. To show this, the article revisits philosophical theories of writing, in particular those of Jacques Derrida and André Leroi-Gourhan, and reads them in light of the computational methods of LLMs to understand in what way ‘generated writing’ diverges from the writing we have known before.
Digital Humanities, ChatGPT, Large Language Models, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Digital Humanities, Derrida, AI, Writing, Leroi-Gourhan, Arts and Humanities, Generated Writing, bepress|Arts and Humanities
Digital Humanities, ChatGPT, Large Language Models, bepress|Arts and Humanities|Digital Humanities, Derrida, AI, Writing, Leroi-Gourhan, Arts and Humanities, Generated Writing, bepress|Arts and Humanities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
