
doi: 10.33540/1324
Many Western European countries have seen strong debates about minority rights and practices such as the founding of religious schools or the wearing of religious symbols in public institutions. In these increasingly diverse societies, tolerance of one another’s practices and beliefs has often been put forward as an indispensable ingredient for harmonious intergroup coexistence. The classical notion of tolerance entails the acceptance of practices that one disapproves of – which implies that tolerance is a balance between reasons to accept and reasons to reject disapproved practices. In this dissertation, Evi Velthuis investigates those reasons for, and boundaries to, intergroup tolerance. Using large-scale surveys and experiments from the Netherlands and Germany, this dissertation presents four empirical chapters which consider three main aspects of tolerance: (1) reasons why minority practices are tolerated, (2) situational factors when practices are tolerated, and (3) individual differences in who tolerates minority practices. The findings and contributions are discussed in light of the social scientific literature on tolerance and intergroup relations.
deprovincialization, minority rights and practices, respect, Duitsland, sociale context, minority motive, motieven van minderheden, deprovincialisatie, identity continuity, Germany, social context, intergroepsrelaties, continuïteit van groepsidentiteit, intergroup coexistence, tolerantie, minderheidsrechten - en gebruiken, Nederland, intergroup tolerance, Netherlands
deprovincialization, minority rights and practices, respect, Duitsland, sociale context, minority motive, motieven van minderheden, deprovincialisatie, identity continuity, Germany, social context, intergroepsrelaties, continuïteit van groepsidentiteit, intergroup coexistence, tolerantie, minderheidsrechten - en gebruiken, Nederland, intergroup tolerance, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
